RANTY RANT RANT
Aug. 8th, 2005 11:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Excuse me? That's a pretty broad statement there! As someone who has written an FMA/HP crossover (which I was told actually made sense by several very good writers and that it was decent), I am hurt by this accusation. Personally.
But more than that, statements like this tick me off. Just because a lot of people don't do something well doesn't mean it can't be done well. If someone said: well, Ed/Winry can't be done without sucking, that doesn't make it true. And I'm sure there would be counter examples. Closed statements like this are limiting. *stomps off*
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 03:37 am (UTC)Yeah, I thought it was a little out there. I saw the same thing, too.
I didn't like how she was being so casual with the whole Nina thing. Don't Tucker and Nina come back in the later eps?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 03:39 am (UTC)She does, though I didn't read the spork. *is too ticked off*
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 09:36 am (UTC)*laughs more*
Closed statements suck, yes they do. And your crossover, my dear, most definitely does not suck. *glomps*
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 02:15 pm (UTC)Though granted, the farther afield you go, the more terrible such things tend to get. (Especially if Milli Vanilli is involved @.@;;;)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 02:25 pm (UTC)*hugs Jeva back*
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 02:31 pm (UTC)And it's OUTTA HERE! *shot*