RANTY RANT RANT

[bard_linn]

eneyla wrote in fma_spork: WHY does everyone cross FMA over with HP? There is no possible way for a FMA/HP crossover to not completely suck!

Excuse me? That's a pretty broad statement there! As someone who has written an FMA/HP crossover (which I was told actually made sense by several very good writers and that it was decent), I am hurt by this accusation. Personally.

But more than that, statements like this tick me off. Just because a lot of people don't do something well doesn't mean it can't be done well. If someone said: well, Ed/Winry can't be done without sucking, that doesn't make it true. And I'm sure there would be counter examples. Closed statements like this are limiting. *stomps off*

Comments

[alchephiliac.livejournal.com]

*pats*

Yeah, I thought it was a little out there. I saw the same thing, too.

I didn't like how she was being so casual with the whole Nina thing. Don't Tucker and Nina come back in the later eps?

[bard-linn.livejournal.com]

*snuggles*

She does, though I didn't read the spork. *is too ticked off*

[jeva-chan.livejournal.com]

*hugs* Yeah. People like that are way narrow-minded. Don't even pay them mind. They don't deserve to be acknowledged if they can't think in a broader scope than that.

[bard-linn.livejournal.com]

*twaps the person so they won't do it again*

*hugs Jeva back*

[stickmarionette.livejournal.com]

*laughs* No way for a FMA/HP crossover to not completely suck?

*laughs more*

Closed statements suck, yes they do. And your crossover, my dear, most definitely does not suck. *glomps*

[bard-linn.livejournal.com]

Yay! *glomps back*

[cryogenia.livejournal.com]

*claps* Agreed. A good writer can make practically any concept work, even to the most jaded of fan.

Though granted, the farther afield you go, the more terrible such things tend to get. (Especially if Milli Vanilli is involved @.@;;;)

[bard-linn.livejournal.com]

*bows* Thanks! That's basically what I meant. ^^;

And it's OUTTA HERE! *shot*